Kleenex Brand Tissue Has a Different Type of Branding Problem

by Stephen Young on October 28, 2011

I would think that it’s a fair assessment to say that most brands would love for the mass population the be aware if them, especially when it comes to top-of-mind awareness. Let’s say that you want a refreshing cola beverage on a hot day…what is it that you want? You’re going to make a photocopy of something at work, so you tell your buddy that you’re going to go “what” it?

The problem is that brands like Coke and Xerox — plus a slew of others including Band-Aid, Frisbee, and Kleenex — are just that. Brands.

More importantly, they are all registered trademarks and not meant to be used generically to describe similar products or services. Using a registered trademark as a generic term can be referred to in several ways: a genericized trademark, a synecdoche, proprietary eponyms, a generic descriptor, or a colloquial description just to name a few.

Now, I’ve got to admit that I am very guilty of this offense. For example, when I go to a restaurant and order a “Coke,” I don’t really care what cola I am brought. You would think that all those advertising classes in college would have beat that out of me, but they didn’t.

So, what’s the issue with using a registered trademark as a generic descriptor? Actually, it’s a big issue.

Let me throw out a few terms: aspirin, thermos, and zipper. Those all used to be registered trademarks, but all lost legal protection due to the overuse of the brand names as generics. They are now exactly that — generics. When a trademark becomes generic, it can be country-specific; what is legally protected in one country might be used as a generic in another.

I came across an ad recently as I was flipping through an issue of Advertising Age magazine that spoke to this very problem. To summarize the ad as briefly as I can, when you sneeze and need a tissue, do you ask for a tissue? Or do you ask for something else?

 Kleenex Brand Tissue, Ad Age, genericized trademark, synecdoche, proprietary eponyms, generic descriptor, colloquial description

You may not realize it, but by using the name Kleenex® as a generic term for tissue, you risk erasing our coveted brand name that we’ve worked so hard for all these years. Kleenex® is a registered trademark and should always be followed by a ® and the words ‘Brand Tissue’. Just pretend it’s in permanent marker.

The ad’s copy is to the point and I like the usage of white space. Nice graphic of the trademark being erased, too, and it illustrates the point.

Now, while I agree that the ® should be used when referencing a registered trademark, I am against it in some social channels (like this blog post, for example), because I don’t think the symbol reads well in a casual medium. Just imagine a ® at the end of every brand name used in this post. This post wouldn’t read quite the same. Then you have the issue of a site like Twitter where you’re limited to the number of characters you can use. That being said, I will definitely work on using registered trademarks to only refer to those specific products.

I’ll leave you with a fun fact that you may not know — up until World War I, heroin was a registered trademark of what is now known as the Bayer company.

 

Share

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Katie-Rose Watson October 28, 2011 at 3:52 pm

Excellent article about brand awareness. We need to start a movement to refer to facial tissues as just that. Keep up the great posts!

Stephen Young October 28, 2011 at 4:08 pm

Hey, thanks!

I can’t recall the last time that I’ve seen an ad that promotes registered trademarks, and I found that one pretty effective. It got me to stop flipping pages and read it (I think it was the image of the trademark symbol being erased that caught my eye).

– Stephen Young
Communications | Advertising | Social Media | Copywriting | Graphic Design | Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: